From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/radeon: convert to use i2c_new_client_device() Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:03:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20200327170342.GA5572@ravnborg.org> References: <20200326211005.13301-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20200326211005.13301-7-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20200327152535.GA2191@ravnborg.org> <20200327154509.GB3971@ninjato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net ([109.247.116.15]:52188 "EHLO asavdk4.altibox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726515AbgC0RDr (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:03:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200327154509.GB3971@ninjato> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Alex Deucher , Wolfram Sang , amd-gfx list , David Airlie , LKML , Maling list - DRI developers , Linux I2C , Alex Deucher , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 04:45:09PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > Move away from the deprecated API. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > > > > > > > patches 1,6, are: > > > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher > > > Should we commit all to drm-misc-next? > > > > I'm fine to see it go through whatever tree makes sense. > > I'd suggest drm-misc-next to minimize merge conflicts. But I can take it > via I2C tree, too, if desired. If no-one else speaks up until tomorrow I will land them in drm-misc-next. Just wanted to make sure it was OK. Sam