From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449D8C2BA19 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E929220737 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=st.com header.i=@st.com header.b="1a6J3nyn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2506064AbgDONKw (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:10:52 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:20516 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2897063AbgDOLfj (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 07:35:39 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046037.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03FBW8SN016220; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:35:24 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=st.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=STMicroelectronics; bh=xwnv8U88f9gKci+4R9gluFy4x+fECpay1QPWcflQP9g=; b=1a6J3nynIHUs1ZBzTWuJaxYH4jNMp3BBhK17usGCKTozaL9ffKuxXU3NnHI3yV4ftL92 mUQ3c0K60Y/1B5c5Aw+jOsV3cYnjNz2jekg253yeaXkRAquScKAT8NaCw/KJEnaJfBH8 7Mhaon5u4CZ1iu7zjqwVUHVNVKonEp7bsvRsWwJdOo9HV5E4ioVxswrMG4/w3VaYeWJx mTUQbXbcrBLEVNBSXsVzmrj2asfCnrgh21Do4WePhZYLMkhH3arPyJsulQzX3JKur0wl AzjJIVogGD6M6WOBUGCHzyIXhFee9d5c/8D3qvZORE8OFsTb9ZMi6paQUpZvbnB/+FxL lg== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30dn94bh6t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:35:24 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id B759110002A; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:35:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag3node2.st.com [10.75.127.8]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id A9F772B0FA8; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:35:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gnbcxd0016.gnb.st.com (10.75.127.48) by SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:35:23 +0200 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:35:22 +0200 From: Alain Volmat To: Wolfram Sang CC: , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-stm32f7: improve nack debug message Message-ID: <20200415113522.GB16949@gnbcxd0016.gnb.st.com> Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , pierre-yves.mordret@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fabrice.gasnier@st.com References: <1584642115-15378-1-git-send-email-alain.volmat@st.com> <20200415110101.GM1141@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200415110101.GM1141@ninjato> X-Disclaimer: ce message est personnel / this message is private X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.48] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG5NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.14) To SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-15_03:2020-04-14,2020-04-15 signatures=0 Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:21:55PM +0100, Alain Volmat wrote: > > From: Fabrice Gasnier > > > > Add information on slave addr in the nack debug message. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier > > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat > > Applied to for-next, thanks! (I'd drop the __func__, though; doesn't > add information, does it?) In fact similar message is displayed in 2 places. One in case of master mode isr and the other one in case of slave isr. This message is adding slave address to the master mode isr. It only makes it more clear on first sight but indeed displaying the slave address obviously means this is master mode.