From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D8CC433E0 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 13:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26062074B for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 13:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728769AbgE3Nmj (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2020 09:42:39 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([88.99.104.3]:33346 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727851AbgE3Nmj (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2020 09:42:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (p5486c6a9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.134.198.169]) by pokefinder.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6016B2C206B; Sat, 30 May 2020 15:42:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 15:42:30 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Hans de Goede Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core: Fix compiler warning in i2c_generic_scl_recovery Message-ID: <20200530134230.GA17392@kunai> References: <20190404130306.13896-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20190424160349.cxaugkros4gtnytb@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Note I'm seeing this with gcc-9.0.1, I've no idea why earlier gcc > versions did not hit this. gcc (Debian 9.3.0-10) 9.3.0 currently here. I never noticed this warning. Do you still see it? Maybe it was just because of the early 9.0 version? --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAl7SYsIACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZWCQ//SeIpoh2v1GhejXHilsCMUI8QDNPf71teK+O3msDMzOT86/N809J3RiuC MoCBMRZjU/2VcG9z3h299s66new26m5oRXNsaXdk8dL1o8HT8WhoF1DaRAoLh9dd OxIweq25lxtNktw88b0aZWaSDeMMTL8/x6cEmvzR/WLx1u4SJUWkAUVE6GWvcrJa sq2jAh+iobuLvO+fd908zaEGo753lc1ReDDeTUHX2sqYqYSFhCFEoypBuCoMvmmO ubu95h+VGQ3Svd8ufe3RIlm0RLgujQPW+FI/GMuRjSBXUvSbhX7c2Qjm48i9Lok3 biNvW+oHYuECF5TqZ4PCE5GnnySO1WHuOICP8ucS0nWSimV85suaC3rhhqLdKE4c MH7TMKSjqvIL0nVBpvOQEcVJK5jNuhkiMxR9TtHmbKMH8G854VF6ZLJ4Dg8uqFpP +KK/+oGKL04BfBjcOF3UCK3v9DOVgAqDN8cMJ579BEWu12ryQjIUvmL8Rv0m6mVw gPXG/NIDEg55FQgIZKj6OX22fsY9EECq1tag1JjukdTNC32UEMCHdNl/mg+Xn8OY KYCAynne+i+s/BQL2PXY5sSiDnGMpRf/r323YOKeUadUpvw23JDBW84TkhAfwkhF UQiqOOPYRwM6Pihybp8iczbdcE8A6ZXidlgfgf/QHIe2AjY3s48= =CF/9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--