From: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon/pmbus: use simple i2c probe function
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:12:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200806221232.278c3878@heffalump.sk2.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f7b5828-cb7c-127a-e454-6c8b8d98777b@roeck-us.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1891 bytes --]
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:15:55 -0700, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> On 8/6/20 9:16 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > pmbus_do_probe doesn't use the id information provided in its second
> > argument, so this can be removed, which then allows using the
> > single-parameter i2c probe function ("probe_new") for probes which
> > don't use the id information either.
> >
> > This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
> >
> > Additionally, in cases where the id information (driver_data) isn't
> > used, the corresponding declarations are removed from the id_table,
> > and .name is specified explicitly.
> >
>
> The ultimate idea seems to be to remove the "old" i2c probe function
> entirely. This means we'll have to touch the various drivers again
> to make that happen if they are not converted to probe_new.
>
> With that in mind, since we are at it, why not use probe_new() in
> every driver and call i2c_match_id() in cases where it is actually
> needed/used ?
Yes, I was planning on doing that in a second phase, but I can do it right
now (perhaps as a patch series) if that would be better.
> Also, I am not convinced that replacements such as
>
> - { "ipsps1", 0 },
> + { .name = "ipsps1" },
>
> are an improvement. I would suggest to leave that alone for
> consistency (and to make it easier to add more devices to the
> various drivers if that happens in the future).
From reading through all the drivers using id_table, it seems to me that we
could do away with driver_data altogether and move all that to driver-local
structures, in many cases covering more than just an id. By only initialising
the elements of the structure that are really needed, I was hoping to (a)
make it more obvious that driver_data isn’t used, and (b) allow removing it
without touching all the code again.
Regards,
Stephen
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-06 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-06 16:16 [PATCH] hwmon/pmbus: use simple i2c probe function Stephen Kitt
2020-08-06 19:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-08-06 20:12 ` Stephen Kitt [this message]
2020-08-06 21:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-08-07 6:23 ` Stephen Kitt
2020-08-07 14:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-08-06 21:57 ` kernel test robot
2020-08-06 23:01 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200806221232.278c3878@heffalump.sk2.org \
--to=steve@sk2.org \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox