From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: i801: Remove unneeded warning after wait_event_timeout timeout
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 12:00:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210525120012.1ea1d5f1@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <103951a0-4233-bbaf-2192-ac140469b07e@gmail.com>
On Sat, 22 May 2021 00:00:28 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> When passing -ETIMEDOUT to i801_check_post() it will emit a timeout
> error message. I don't see much benefit in an additional warning
> stating more or less the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> index 99d446763..bfea94d02 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> @@ -509,11 +509,9 @@ static int i801_transaction(struct i801_priv *priv, int xact)
> result = wait_event_timeout(priv->waitq,
> (status = priv->status),
> adap->timeout);
> - if (!result) {
> + if (!result)
> status = -ETIMEDOUT;
> - dev_warn(&priv->pci_dev->dev,
> - "Timeout waiting for interrupt!\n");
> - }
> +
> priv->status = 0;
> return i801_check_post(priv, status);
> }
> @@ -732,11 +730,9 @@ static int i801_block_transaction_byte_by_byte(struct i801_priv *priv,
> result = wait_event_timeout(priv->waitq,
> (status = priv->status),
> adap->timeout);
> - if (!result) {
> + if (!result)
> status = -ETIMEDOUT;
> - dev_warn(&priv->pci_dev->dev,
> - "Timeout waiting for interrupt!\n");
> - }
> +
> priv->status = 0;
> return i801_check_post(priv, status);
> }
I have to agree.
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Tested-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 21:59 [PATCH 0/2] i2c: i801: Replace waitqueue with completion API Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-21 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: i801: Remove unneeded warning after wait_event_timeout timeout Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-25 10:00 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2021-05-27 20:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-05-21 22:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: i801: Replace waitqueue with completion API Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-25 12:12 ` Jean Delvare
2021-05-25 13:01 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-05-27 7:13 ` Daniel Kurtz
2021-05-27 20:09 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210525120012.1ea1d5f1@endymion \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).