From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3EFC433EF for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC5161288 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 09:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236907AbhKHJai (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 04:30:38 -0500 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]:62927 "EHLO esa.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236895AbhKHJai (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 04:30:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1636363674; x=1667899674; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=74FnR9vgcDFXkuWZQV0hKGDtGOJaEDp/RBJp8o4iChQ=; b=jDbSwpV0w/AaDyD2JI4BW1DdC+G/l0niWKVAm+ndovYYlmStDOBr114C I2KO68fYTV/Z/spdQIXENdV1rRcfiCxBaLL+G09UJWQjuDV/E2BDUvDo/ efXDGoHH3MGkYdvljjJ0Z9UXBbC3ua60D1xMg0wrVKPwFRb7oLN4MY5U/ GaHp8/PkCqUrXyYvhseg1qXCTUX4oP5kIEOPydq7sTx+lyaV4vfKnLD++ vLCf0Axvh0cbS5kcoJeyUHM37DT/hWeSu9EKC7EMJVvnB6ydXN5ofSD+5 /ZwmaYFhe4gzVXoqk9JfUkKFELo64nHk4FuVbWN6+CgDkLLfQI9aqWZ1R g==; IronPort-SDR: vMJwi2LmYYOjzTR7IkrCYqi1SeJ6mLD+8iiLx6ZEgHmFM5b5aySwXhtAe5EVEiHJ5ArxelZCsa jPB+lUSGQvi50KJyXOcV7+WvHWw8UYyehW6kdtZiJoBlg1mlLFpmkK2xutibkPzpBCtP/ekImF gZNJ2OMXCJOxidDeO4Fd3uNm7r5hrPDxCfzZ2wxsBHMhzotfyI8Xde9dLPVTm4GFWhJtRWYzi0 TUb2FT0xW75FPwlcBPOip11JVk6aaZoSe/jkXfVZOqBbt31cHjJKpCM3r5y2t088MOs6d8/+Jp BsNDPPZJyHOn/k0jDodN9mkT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,218,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="75674635" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 08 Nov 2021 02:27:53 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 02:27:53 -0700 Received: from localhost (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 02:27:53 -0700 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 10:29:42 +0100 From: Horatiu Vultur - M31836 To: Codrin Ciubotariu - M19940 CC: Wolfram Sang , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , Nicolas Ferre - M43238 , "alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" , "Ludovic Desroches - M43218" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source Message-ID: <20211108092942.uulvtqoi36wnbisg@soft-dev3-1.localhost> References: <20211012140718.2138278-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <8a775c67-00a3-1dbe-daa3-09a537f482d8@microchip.com> <20211013114144.7j4scdaq2rjfmiwn@soft-dev3-1.localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org The 11/08/2021 08:35, Codrin Ciubotariu - M19940 wrote: > On 05.11.2021 23:47, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently > >> lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes > >> are required. > > > > Not even patch 1/2? > > > > we can keep the new compatible, but patch 2/2 needs to be split. For me it is OK to use the compatible string 'microchip,sam9x60-i2c' > > Best regards, > Codrin -- /Horatiu