linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] i2c: i801: make FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC dependent on FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:13:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220607161320.6ce0db40@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e5774c2-26a2-dd4b-29ca-e1eca32ef889@gmail.com>

Hi Heiner,

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:55:46 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> According to the datasheet the block process call requires block
> buffer mode. The user may disable block buffer mode by module
> parameter disable_features, in such a case we have to clear
> FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC.

In which datasheet are you seeing this? Can you point me to the
specific section and/or quote the statement? I can't find it in the
datasheet I'm looking at (ICH9, Intel document 316972-002) but it is
huge and I may just be missing it.

Also, same request as previous patch, I'd like a comment in the code,
so that developers don't have to read the git log to figure out why this
piece of code is there.

Furthermore, as far as I can see, the FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC flag only
affects the value returned by i801_func(). i801_access() does not
verify whether this flag is set before processing a command where size
== I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL. I think it should? Otherwise your fix is
only partial (will work if the device driver calls .functionality as it
is supposed to, will fail with - I suppose - unpredictable results if
the device driver calls .smbus_xfer directly).

> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> index eccdc7035..1d8182901 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> @@ -1675,6 +1675,9 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  	}
>  	priv->features &= ~disable_features;
>  
> +	if (!(priv->features & FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER))
> +		priv->features &= ~FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC;
> +
>  	err = pcim_enable_device(dev);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&dev->dev, "Failed to enable SMBus PCI device (%d)\n",

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-07 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-15 16:53 [PATCH 0/8] i2c: i801: Series with minor improvements Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/8] i2c: i801: improve interrupt handler Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-07 12:34   ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-15 22:15     ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/8] i2c: i801: make FEATURE_HOST_NOTIFY dependent on FEATURE_IRQ Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-07 12:48   ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-16 20:23     ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] i2c: i801: make FEATURE_BLOCK_PROC dependent on FEATURE_BLOCK_BUFFER Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-07 14:13   ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2022-12-16 20:57     ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] i2c: i801: enable FEATURE_IRQ and FEATURE_I2C_BLOCK_READ on all chip versions Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-07 14:24   ` Jean Delvare
2022-06-13 17:08     ` Jean Delvare
2022-06-14 12:59       ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-16 21:36         ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] i2c: i801: add helper i801_set_hstadd() Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-09 13:53   ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-16 21:37     ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] i2c: i801: add i801_single_transaction(), complementing i801_block_transaction() Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-10 11:03   ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-17 17:07     ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-04-15 16:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] i2c: i801: call i801_check_pre() from i801_access() Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-10 13:52   ` Jean Delvare
2022-04-15 16:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] i2c: i801: call i801_check_post() " Heiner Kallweit
2022-06-10 14:31   ` Jean Delvare
2022-12-17 17:21     ` Heiner Kallweit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220607161320.6ce0db40@endymion.delvare \
    --to=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).