From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601B7C83F11 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229607AbjH1HBo (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2023 03:01:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42786 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229598AbjH1HBR (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2023 03:01:17 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A679E for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80266219CD; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:01:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1693206072; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FfzvH8IbPPXwfOoleHWJTY5IBI85wLwTjrP9d73Rc6o=; b=jtkbXlS1bnHwYLcxasUJDJXN+/QD8D+QJtm516c68Hh+JdQ87zzv9XSnazzU5p5ZrjisyD 0M1FJ9QtayTaRlY3E97aL5+vb/0aR7HhKQaByAyYaNhOvesPjd8Ht3I0Pwr8R3HaUQUQra wvz8zPmm/2p/kkVH8MeWkIp98/rlhAg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1693206072; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FfzvH8IbPPXwfOoleHWJTY5IBI85wLwTjrP9d73Rc6o=; b=dhGnZusf22KxWRkddIDS99U0GY0sPqEH+U0TwNY2qWWp8+suF95J1EEa5d7K9ZE5HsK2kL Nf5WgC5VN+T9BrCw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62F3E139CC; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id PdSpFjhG7GSYBgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:01:12 +0000 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:01:10 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: i801: Replace acpi_lock with I2C bus lock Message-ID: <20230828090110.0cf57a00@endymion.delvare> In-Reply-To: References: <8f88906f-c7da-eb3a-2f14-0f4d46202517@gmail.com> <20230626195951.1695cda6@endymion.delvare> Organization: SUSE Linux X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.34; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiner, On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 18:21:43 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 26.06.2023 19:59, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Looks reasonable, I also can't see any reason why that wouldn't work. > > But locking and power management can be tricky of course. I'll test > > this for some time, but I don't think my system actually suffers from > > this ACPI resource conflict, so this most probably won't be testing > > much in practice. > > What's your opinion after more testing? Positive, as I did not hit any problem. As said before, my testing is limited by design and thus is no guarantee that the change is OK in all cases, but at least it's good enough to merge it and see what happens. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support