From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] lockdep WARN at PCI device rescan
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:57:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231114155701.GA27547@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZVNiUuyHaez8rwL-@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:04:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:47:15AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > On 14.11.2023 11:16, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:54:29AM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > > The lockdep splat indicates possible deadlock between
> > > > pci_rescan_remove_lock and work_completion lock have deadlock
> > > > possibility.
> > > > In the call stack, I found that the workqueue thread for
> > > > i801_probe() calls p2sb_bar(), which locks pci_rescan_remove_lock.
> >
> > i801 just uses p2sb_bar(), I don't see any issue in i801. Root cause
> > seems to be in the PCI subsystem. Calling p2sb_bar() from a PCI driver
> > probe callback seems to be problematic, nevertheless it's a valid API
> > usage.
>
> So, currently I'm lack of (good) ideas and would like to hear other (more
> experienced) PCI developers on how is to address this...
Can you add a p2sb_bar_locked() library call which is used by the
i801 probe path?
Basically rename p2sb_bar() to __p2sb_bar() and add a third parameter
of type boolean which signifies whether it's invoked in locked context
or not, then call that from p2sb_bar() and p2sb_bar_locked() wrappers.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-14 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 6:54 [bug report] lockdep WARN at PCI device rescan Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-11-14 10:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-11-14 10:47 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-11-14 12:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-14 15:57 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2023-11-14 16:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-14 17:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-24 10:49 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-11-24 15:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-28 7:45 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-11-29 11:17 ` Lukas Wunner
[not found] ` <ZWdBnMTOq9wIt9L-@smile.fi.intel.com>
2023-11-29 13:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-11-30 7:30 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-11-30 9:36 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-12-01 0:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-12-01 10:46 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-11-30 15:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-01 10:34 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-11-24 17:30 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-11-28 10:16 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-11-29 11:30 ` Lukas Wunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231114155701.GA27547@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox