From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com, arnd@arndb.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: devices: add AT24 eeprom support
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:47:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231129174722.7d4e768c@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MdsEWxJLHL__zYXGEMYvvLSH99GsTRv_NTaVXt2fGtNvg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
brgl@bgdev.pl wrote on Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:10:28 +0100:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 5:46 PM Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > I dropped the backward compatibility since this is a new driver not
> > having to deal with it. The old and the new driver can not be used by
> > the same kernel config. So it is either using the MTD eeprom driver
> > supporting partitioning and NVMEM or the older one which does not
> > support partitioning but keeps the backward compatibility.
> >
> > Comments and suggestions are very welcome :)
>
> I skimmed through the code. Nothing obviously wrong. What I would
> suggest - if we're going to have two at24 drivers - is a lot more code
> reuse. I dislike the idea of having basically the same code in two
> places in the kernel and having to fix bugs in both.
Agreed.
> Though if I'm being honest - I would prefer a single driver with
> backwards compatibility. Have you estimated the effort it would take
> to abstract both nvmem and mtd?
Also agreed :-)
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-29 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 16:46 [RFC PATCH] mtd: devices: add AT24 eeprom support Marco Felsch
2023-11-29 9:10 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-11-29 16:47 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-11-29 17:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-01 14:44 ` Marco Felsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231129174722.7d4e768c@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox