From: Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Cc: Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: fix potential spinlock recursion on poll
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 17:06:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206090641.18849-1-jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com> (raw)
Possible deadlock scenario (on reboot):
rk3x_i2c_xfer_common(polling)
-> rk3x_i2c_wait_xfer_poll()
-> rk3x_i2c_irq(0, i2c);
--> spin_lock(&i2c->lock);
...
<rk3x i2c interrupt>
-> rk3x_i2c_irq(0, i2c);
--> spin_lock(&i2c->lock); (deadlock here)
Store the IRQ number and disable/enable it around the polling transfer.
This patch has been tested on NanoPC-T4.
Signed-off-by: Jensen Huang <jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
index a044ca0c35a1..94514637c3bd 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ struct rk3x_i2c {
struct clk *clk;
struct clk *pclk;
struct notifier_block clk_rate_nb;
+ int irq;
/* Settings */
struct i2c_timings t;
@@ -1087,13 +1088,18 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags);
- rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
-
if (!polling) {
+ rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
+
timeout = wait_event_timeout(i2c->wait, !i2c->busy,
msecs_to_jiffies(WAIT_TIMEOUT));
} else {
+ disable_irq(i2c->irq);
+ rk3x_i2c_start(i2c);
+
timeout = rk3x_i2c_wait_xfer_poll(i2c);
+
+ enable_irq(i2c->irq);
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags);
@@ -1310,6 +1316,8 @@ static int rk3x_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
+ i2c->irq = irq;
+
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, i2c);
if (i2c->soc_data->calc_timings == rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_timings) {
--
2.42.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 9:06 Jensen Huang [this message]
2023-12-06 9:29 ` [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: fix potential spinlock recursion on poll Heiko Stübner
2023-12-06 12:27 ` Andi Shyti
2023-12-06 20:36 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206090641.18849-1-jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com \
--to=jensenhuang@friendlyarm.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox