linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@gmail.com>
To: o.rempel@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	andi.shyti@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, Frank.Li@nxp.com
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, francesco.dolcini@toradex.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] i2c: imx: prevent rescheduling in non-dma mode
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2024 13:19:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241002112020.23913-1-eichest@gmail.com> (raw)

While running tests on an i.MX8M Mini connected to a TI ADS1015 ADC, we
found that the ADC would stop responding to i2c requests because it
would timeout after the bus was idle for 25ms. This timeout could be
traced back to the rescheduling events in the i2c-imx driver. The
problem is that if the system is under heavy load, the schedule call and
the wait_event_timeout may be rescheduled too late to reach the 25ms
timeout. The same problem may occur with other SMBus devices. Therefore,
this patchset removes the scheduling calls for non-DMA mode by handling
the interrupt events directly in the ISR instead of scheduling a task to
handle the events.

This patch will introduce some bigger changes because the logic for
handling events in the ISR had to be rewritten. Therefore we have tested
the following combinations:
- i.MX8M Mini with dma
- i.MX8M Mini without dma
- i.MX8M Plus with dma
- i.MX8M Plus without dma
- i.MX7D with dma
- i.MX7D without dma
- i.MX7D atomic mode

Because we do not have any devices that use the SMBus block transfer
mode, we were not able to test it. 

The ideas are based on the RFC:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240531142437.74831-1-eichest@gmail.com/
However, the handling of events in the ISR is new, because further
testing showed that it was not enough to simply remove the schedule
call.

Changes since v3:
- Fixed style issues with checkpatch.pl --strict (Andi)
- Add comments to explain the code (Andi)

Changes since v2:
- Add Acked-by tags from Oleksij
- Renamed i2c_imx_start_read to i2c_imx_prepare_read
- I did not add a Fixes tag because the issues from Flavio have a
  different root cause and are not fixed by this patchset

Changes since v1:
- Add Reviewed-by tags from Frank
- Add new patch to use readb_relaxed and writeb_relaxed (Frank)
- Update commit message for patch 1 with some clarifications (Frank)

Stefan Eichenberger (4):
  i2c: imx: only poll for bus busy in multi master mode
  i2c: imx: separate atomic, dma and non-dma use case
  i2c: imx: use readb_relaxed and writeb_relaxed
  i2c: imx: prevent rescheduling in non dma mode

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 369 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 317 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-10-02 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-02 11:19 Stefan Eichenberger [this message]
2024-10-02 11:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] i2c: imx: only poll for bus busy in multi master mode Stefan Eichenberger
2024-10-02 14:40   ` Lucas Stach
2024-10-02 14:56     ` Stefan Eichenberger
2024-10-02 15:16       ` Lucas Stach
2024-10-02 11:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] i2c: imx: separate atomic, dma and non-dma use case Stefan Eichenberger
2024-10-02 11:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] i2c: imx: use readb_relaxed and writeb_relaxed Stefan Eichenberger
2024-10-02 11:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-10-02 13:08     ` Stefan Eichenberger
2024-10-02 13:36       ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-10-02 14:36         ` Stefan Eichenberger
2024-10-02 11:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] i2c: imx: prevent rescheduling in non dma mode Stefan Eichenberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241002112020.23913-1-eichest@gmail.com \
    --to=eichest@gmail.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=francesco.dolcini@toradex.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).