From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc (mail.andi.de1.cc [178.238.236.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30152620DD; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.238.236.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741720499; cv=none; b=E10UiCxORadDpmRL8pHjKaaIR8+UR+mlPvN2M/R/g/v2K6AakE2QsIYf5fH7d7ZsM4J3fXd3cho86h3PEzxPvQX6At6QVgz13/ePJuMLF//IhN8cMyju8DZ4DCBbI1WTJD8o+4NXcUYzA8KtKcHtyks985YqskdaCUGAtIuqb9E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741720499; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+4FBym89tJ0UDJqFPTZuM50h9ll/UMyW63UxK5b942k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N3be03tBpWi8oMxEB7QPsrS9VlcEB2bmLsbAwdcifN+bAmRvyuYNyFgcMfbqIOz3ql3Of2cwKp/OnkBybLtBdiKVYz5OXjDAQuxK+W2NwShabKBEk96kiLcLky//Fw4240ijDqVfI7Fnq9BIuM6C0ft3E9t2LwIQfvDIt+p8qLg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b=YrJKGCic; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.238.236.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="YrJKGCic" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20220719; h=References:In-Reply-To:Cc:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=CBduAOkDSwxepXVq1C+G3BYIavodzVnFqo9RdkSAQlE=; b=YrJKGCicDK2subZPy1Kw3aiJMR +b1PqcgLYekFehJvISmFny7yA1Rhuc9o6u6dUZpW2aNvY+RtCgFzWKKpun4e+7k/41ScUbYHtVFsU 4i5Pte6iRWMl4EYgYLa5uER1e/WRoUzVEyay5JqOaTfxggHzIcORNXh4aQBZc+q4R6zEa1aqt77XM w4yy6N5pKPlr5JRdzwGVsXde1u6wosZGo3+RKeyiscOAMv3W5TE4jZ9hPO2QgNAcbIWQ6ERQFSeg2 LgalTWSfR+k930iQeLs/mjH2GXYO+QcZFx49/Gi0mhYAZ2wEB0ionmlcT6ri6mv50QfQ2Q8dKuTMj m7IkY5sQ==; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:14:50 +0100 From: Andreas Kemnade To: Wolfram Sang Cc: vigneshr@ti.com, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, khilman@baylibre.com, rogerq@kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, jmkrzyszt@gmail.com, andi.shyti@kernel.org, reidt@ti.com, wsa@kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: omap: fix IRQ storms Message-ID: <20250311201450.61d48787@akair> In-Reply-To: References: <20250228140420.379498-1-andreas@kemnade.info> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:29:04 +0100 schrieb Wolfram Sang : > > This needs at least to be tested on systems where false acks were > > detected. > > Which do you mean? You did test this on GTA04A5, or? > Exactly the tests which Nishanth did. So I would say with his Tested-By, this patch is good to go. I test on GTA04A5 but there and on any other system I have I did not observe the false acks but there I have the IRQ storm. And I want a solution which avoids the IRQ storm and also does not reintroduce the false acks. Regards, Andreas