Re: [PATCH v2 04/19] dt-bindings: arm: move AT91 to generic Microchip binding

Alexandre Belloni
2025-12-16T22:40:17Z

On 16/12/2025 20:35:49+0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> What do you think about renaming the SparX-5 binding and adding LAN969x to that?
> Cause both are from the current Microchip and from the same UNG
> business unit, with
> probably more generations to follow.
>
> LAN969x does not really belong in Atmel bindings to me, but I am flexible.
>

On the contrary, this is the one that is based on the "previously atmel"
BU SoCs. It is a sama7 with a microchip UNG switch while SparX-5 looks
more like a microsemi chip with ARM64 cores instead of mips.

--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering