From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3FB33F5BA; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 09:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773998698; cv=none; b=XSV5S8fGhGAi47BZApIFRew27k3YkzGG0QYWRy17XE186Osl5ZT6zR97JtbeTcKqZzvFb5ksFeQDFYtiJDUZYbkomEPpxdhUMwMbuoNC3Lphq9NutvhZhFo2eVW6n4CAv80AbiGrqeYJ6lsl8sAWyPh6erCa90aOeYaEzgU3KCk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773998698; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JhovlCCRFIcQnnOt8rpjmH8E0JhfopFVJaFIPDeTz0E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FBabg8j1g+gszivpL5AcXGbnBLaMajqQfPkle4qiODbXpKV9hL6Yh6droBKq0qNMijEmPgjl+SespUF10jnRFUS4id7bvta0PPM1C6zGPEyDWyG6v7dydkk+3c84dl4RLnd1g1mdmIHqCfR0/kcmeXVk5PnJ5vIh2Wjnl+AuNfo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=S+lP9vgx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="S+lP9vgx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08E17C2BCAF; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 09:24:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773998698; bh=JhovlCCRFIcQnnOt8rpjmH8E0JhfopFVJaFIPDeTz0E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S+lP9vgxFczkZ1lgz0/rDbqh2i0Ey1m8c7j4xGjl9kJSpaHphW9qa2MirYTiH3821 rt6CHCXXDuNV5SOWKB+yfgQEFajQ7JxQD5iYt2U0FspX5K36+Tr55uJE7d32lejtCi clZMpTfGGXMZntEtZTr8NTah53TZUYfKU80CJnfpxmvDT+4bqCta0djtFFmTb/O/B1 nV4dhd4LW7xOAq4S5opHsweoiG8/hS9B6MAZb0ZKwMYvNCHJckiCyd2Uv6y6asJZVF 1X2p93eWH8v6wGLC7LyW6TfYtnzADGzQ5mLgmfdi8JYk7P9HQ3mh4zGNh8AfLpS9Qx thNEw9m1lGlRg== Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 10:24:55 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Rustam Adilov Cc: Chris Packham , Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] dt-bindings: i2c: realtek,rtl9301-i2c: extend for RTL9607C support Message-ID: <20260320-serious-noisy-ladybug-bad92b@quoll> References: <20260319175753.32338-1-adilov@disroot.org> <20260319175753.32338-8-adilov@disroot.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260319175753.32338-8-adilov@disroot.org> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 10:57:52PM +0500, Rustam Adilov wrote: > Add the "realtek,rtl9607-i2c" compatible for i2c controller on the > RTL9607C SoC series. > > Add a clocks property to the properties since RTL9607C requires it > along with the realtek,scl. And because RTL9607C is the only one that My previous statement: "Other devices do not *have* any clock input?" And second one: "If devices *do not have* clock, you set it as false (see example schema and even line above!). Clue here is what I wrote "devices" and "do not have"." So why are you using completely different wording "require" with completely different implications? I did not leave any room for interpreation in my statement "If devices *do not have* clock, you set it as false". Best regards, Krzysztof