From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E73745A297; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 18:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789928673; cv=none; b=IAVWpX1FCc7Hpg1lcX3izssLcfaUqRNGHlvSU1QyamU1aFgj2B972ZxXrH+DjvGrW6C6H595Q82AVclvrynj1HRVHD10phnlyaejxd2f27yp37m1dgSlx8uqZuJ8HaXvIpKJVkGwHncr2qf/IpiyBaKVsrul9E64B/ZRggNjzPw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789928673; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wetqL7yeDkif7OVG4S+1UbSEbh/sk/5MkK6vpSkgdJk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Y23kcBq+6b3jW+W0v5Pa3NiSFil4PgYVo/crLg/P8T9LMSuwH46ZDHov8YY7RmbFPn6tH5bVrn/686vtknHYqUPr+04nHI0yQ3fsZBHGs6eMVSWEEvbJRnzdkAOsbuYEbsEpY1YulX8jdiQ4JCi9sRHFg5miawiMh7js623n3Mo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GtDF3E2g; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GtDF3E2g" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB62F1F000FF; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 18:24:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789928671; bh=wetqL7yeDkif7OVG4S+1UbSEbh/sk/5MkK6vpSkgdJk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=GtDF3E2gwyvrCvXG36PVngtCs7TL5bxZDpf98vz3A8xd9q2OMx//ZhXg9GQqfXiHy wJmIJ2T3dVaZ3HTELiG/dqNml0hT3Wz6T5GTAbkFLedri8oR752au4PNNlNtlW7NbR r0f4y5tD6WlJrg/JTxuo097Qo4mxbAtXGQBEZbD0G3Oq2VNZw26jYZOooYzI8hY9Rc csk6TtkQ80c9fdpgBWNygLUTMNXlBY6h8QFjDRtBNcmdUkOfq5Dmn2ULZ63IHpoy/8 y4i2s1DUDCWXnP+LY12Y6FPhufUpjpZfhPcipbuPXX8enSKjbEPorYe0yg30TJdw9X MBZvGJ7yNuyvw== Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 20:24:29 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Aniket Limaye Cc: Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Mika Westerberg , Nirujogi Pratap , Bin Du , Andy Shevchenko , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com, nm@ti.com, u-kumar1@ti.com, lianfeng.ouyang@starfivetech.com, Ritwick.Sharma@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: dw: Add DWC_i2c compatible Message-ID: <20260920-warm-lurking-poodle-dd73ee@quoll> References: <20260919-tda54-upstream-i2c-v1-0-b0b9f77be18b@ti.com> <20260919-tda54-upstream-i2c-v1-1-b0b9f77be18b@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260919-tda54-upstream-i2c-v1-1-b0b9f77be18b@ti.com> On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 02:36:06PM +0530, Aniket Limaye wrote: > Add the "snps,dwc-i2c" compatible for Synopsys Advanced I2C Controller > referred as DWC_i2c. Compared to the existing "snps,designware-i2c" dwc is designware, so snps,dwc-i2c = snps,designware-i2c I think this is *the* argument why generic compatibles are wrong. Best regards, Krzysztof