From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic Desroches Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: sama5d3: reduce TWI internal clock frequency Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:07:34 +0100 Message-ID: <21404.4217639186$1385132894@news.gmane.org> References: <1385129228-11225-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20131122143350.GA7420@katana> <20131122145141.GB30749@ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20131122145835.GB7420@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131122145835.GB7420@katana> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, Ludovic Desroches , nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:58:35PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:51:41PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > Hi Wolfram, > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:33:51PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:07:08PM +0100, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com wrote: > > > > From: Ludovic Desroches > > > > > > > > There are still I2C unexpected behaviors which are solved by reducing TWI > > > > internal frequency. > > > > > > > > Cc: #3.10+ > > > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > > > > > > I think the commit message needs more details. Is this a true bugfix > > > because the real bus frequency was too high because of the wrong > > > divider? Is this a workaround which makes things work but will make the > > > bus frequency slower than it should be? > > > > This fix doesn't concern the i2c bus frequency, only the internal IP frequency. > > > > TWI has been validated at 66MHz. With some devices, transfer hangs during i2c > > frame transmission. This issue disappears when reducing the internal frequency > > of the IP. Maybe there is some oversampling on i2c signals. > > Unfortunately, I have no clear status about the root cause that's why > > the commit message was imprecise. > > This paragraph is a way better commit message IMO :) > Ok I'll update it. Thanks for the review Wolfram. Regards Ludovic