From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: at91: enable probe deferring on dma channel request Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:03:34 +0100 Message-ID: <2530739.DkVu7IemRV@wuerfel> References: <1416577472-24542-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <1416577472-24542-2-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1416577472-24542-2-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ludovic Desroches Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org, nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Friday 21 November 2014 14:44:32 Ludovic Desroches wrote: > If dma controller is not probed, defer i2c probe. > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > --- Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Arnd, > > It's a combination of the first patch I sent and yours. As you said that my > patch "looks wrong but actually it's ok" I didn't dare to add your > signed-off-by. I think a good way to deal with this is to explain in the patch description who wrote what part. Arnd