* [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible
@ 2022-06-23 16:31 Sebastian Reichel
2022-06-26 20:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-07 21:09 ` Wolfram Sang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Reichel @ 2022-06-23 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c, linux-rockchip, devicetree,
Sebastian Reichel, kernel
Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
index 5339dd4fc370..2f79f6d57e2d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties:
- rockchip,rk3308-i2c
- rockchip,rk3328-i2c
- rockchip,rk3568-i2c
+ - rockchip,rk3588-i2c
- const: rockchip,rk3399-i2c
reg:
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible
2022-06-23 16:31 [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible Sebastian Reichel
@ 2022-06-26 20:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-06 19:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-07-07 21:09 ` Wolfram Sang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2022-06-26 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Reichel, Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c, linux-rockchip, devicetree, kernel
On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
That's still some old tree you are based on...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible
2022-06-26 20:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2022-07-06 19:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-07-06 19:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2022-07-06 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Sebastian Reichel, Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-i2c, linux-rockchip, devicetree,
kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 468 bytes --]
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> That's still some old tree you are based on...
What do you mean by that?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible
2022-07-06 19:34 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2022-07-06 19:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-07 0:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2022-07-06 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang, Sebastian Reichel, Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-i2c, linux-rockchip, devicetree,
kernel
On 06/07/2022 21:34, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> That's still some old tree you are based on...
>
> What do you mean by that?
The patch was sent to not updated email, so I assume it was based on
something before v5.18. Could be relevant, could be not, but it raises a
question what was a base this (and other Rockchip) series. :)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible
2022-07-06 19:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2022-07-07 0:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Reichel @ 2022-07-07 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Wolfram Sang, Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
linux-i2c, linux-rockchip, devicetree, kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1019 bytes --]
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 09:55:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/07/2022 21:34, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:22:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 23/06/2022 18:31, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >>> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.yaml | 1 +
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> That's still some old tree you are based on...
> >
> > What do you mean by that?
>
> The patch was sent to not updated email, so I assume it was based on
> something before v5.18. Could be relevant, could be not, but it raises a
> question what was a base this (and other Rockchip) series. :)
The last round of rk3588 patches (incl. this one) are based on
v5.19-rc1, but mail destinations are not (I do not generate the
mail destinations fully automatic).
-- Sebastian
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible
2022-06-23 16:31 [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible Sebastian Reichel
2022-06-26 20:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2022-07-07 21:09 ` Wolfram Sang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2022-07-07 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Reichel
Cc: Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-i2c,
linux-rockchip, devicetree, kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 250 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:31:36PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Just like RK356x, RK3588 is compatible to the existing rk3399 binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Applied to for-next, thanks!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-07 21:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-23 16:31 [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-rk3x: add rk3588 compatible Sebastian Reichel
2022-06-26 20:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-06 19:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-07-06 19:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-07 0:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-07-07 21:09 ` Wolfram Sang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).