From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>,
pali.rohar@gmail.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 22:04:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2682382.6cA2VZCBS9@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462354045-94455-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
On Wednesday, May 04, 2016 12:27:25 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Many Intel systems the BIOS declares a SystemIO OpRegion below the SMBus
> PCI device as can be seen in ACPI DSDT table from Lenovo Yoga 900:
>
> Device (SBUS)
> {
> OperationRegion (SMBI, SystemIO, (SBAR << 0x05), 0x10)
> Field (SMBI, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
> {
> HSTS, 8,
> Offset (0x02),
> HCON, 8,
> HCOM, 8,
> TXSA, 8,
> DAT0, 8,
> DAT1, 8,
> HBDR, 8,
> PECR, 8,
> RXSA, 8,
> SDAT, 16
> }
>
> There are also bunch of AML methods that that the BIOS can use to access
> these fields. Most of the systems in question AML methods accessing the
> SMBI OpRegion are never used.
>
> Now, because of this SMBI OpRegion many systems fail to load the SMBus
> driver with an error looking like one below:
>
> ACPI Warning: SystemIO range 0x0000000000003040-0x000000000000305F
> conflicts with OpRegion 0x0000000000003040-0x000000000000304F
> (\_SB.PCI0.SBUS.SMBI) (20160108/utaddress-255)
> ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use
> it instead of the native driver
>
> The reason is that this SMBI OpRegion conflicts with the PCI BAR used by
> the SMBus driver.
>
> It turns out that we can install a custom SystemIO address space handler
> for the SMBus device to intercept all accesses through that OpRegion. This
> allows us to share the PCI BAR with the AML code if it for some reason is
> using it. We do not expect that this OpRegion handler will ever be called
> but if it is we print a warning and prevent all access from the SMBus
> driver itself.
>
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> This is a second try. The first version of the patch is here:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/616120/
>
> This version inhibits all further driver access to the SMBus device when
> BIOS first time uses the conflicting OpRegion.
>
> I've tested this using MinnowBoard MAX with modified DSDT where _STA
> (device status) method tries to read from the OpRegion and it seems to
> work. Below is the modified ASL if someone wants to give it a try:
>
> Device (SBUS)
> {
> Name (_ADR, 0x001F0003) // _ADR: Address
> OperationRegion (SMBP, PCI_Config, 0x40, 0xC0)
> Field (SMBP, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
> {
> , 2,
> I2CE, 1
> }
>
> OperationRegion (SMPB, PCI_Config, 0x20, 0x04)
> Field (SMPB, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
> {
> , 5,
> SBAR, 11
> }
>
> OperationRegion (SMBI, SystemIO, (SBAR << 0x05), 0x10)
> Field (SMBI, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
> {
> HSTS, 8,
> Offset (0x02),
> HCON, 8,
> HCOM, 8,
> TXSA, 8,
> DAT0, 8,
> DAT1, 8,
> HBDR, 8,
> PECR, 8,
> RXSA, 8,
> SDAT, 16
> }
>
> Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
> {
> Local0 = HSTS
> Local0 += 1
> Local1 = SDAT
> Local1 += 1
> Return (0xF)
> }
> }
>
> Basically it just does two reads from the OpRegion whenever device status
> is queried. After that accesses to the bus fails:
>
> # i2cget -y 9 0xc 0 b
> Error: Read failed
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> index 5652bf6ce9be..e200cdbd2882 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> @@ -247,6 +247,13 @@ struct i801_priv {
> struct platform_device *mux_pdev;
> #endif
> struct platform_device *tco_pdev;
> +
> + /*
> + * If set to true the host controller registers are reserved for
> + * ACPI AML use. Protected by acpi_lock.
> + */
> + bool acpi_reserved;
> + struct mutex acpi_lock;
> };
>
> #define FEATURE_SMBUS_PEC (1 << 0)
> @@ -720,6 +727,12 @@ static s32 i801_access(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr,
> int ret = 0, xact = 0;
> struct i801_priv *priv = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
>
> + mutex_lock(&priv->acpi_lock);
> + if (priv->acpi_reserved) {
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->acpi_lock);
> + return -EPERM;
I'd return -EIO from here as that's what it looks like from the caller's perspective.
That's not a big deal, though, so
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-04 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 9:27 [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR Mika Westerberg
2016-05-04 9:40 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-04 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-05-06 8:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-06 12:12 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-06 12:20 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2682382.6cA2VZCBS9@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mario_limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).