From: "Sven Peter" <sven@svenpeter.dev>
To: "Janne Grunau" <j@jannau.net>, "Hector Martin" <marcan@marcan.st>,
"Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@kernel.org>,
"Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Mark Kettenis" <kettenis@openbsd.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: i2c: apple,i2c: allow multiple compatibles
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 21:22:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2baebbe6-0080-4cff-86de-a00f23aea95e@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211121171545.27402-3-j@jannau.net>
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021, at 18:15, Janne Grunau wrote:
> The intention was to have a SoC-specific and base compatible string
> to allow forward compatibility and SoC specific quirks,
>
> Fixes: df7c4a8c1b47 ("dt-bindings: i2c: Add Apple I2C controller bindings")
> Signed-off-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>
> Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@openbsd.org>
> ---
Yeah, this should've been "apple,t8103-i2c", "apple,i2c" all along :/
Given that we have no i2c nodes in the dts yet and that this binding was
only added for -rc1 I think it's fine to just drop "apple,t8103-i2c"
here instead of marking it as deprecated and keeping it around forever
if Mark Kettenis also agrees.
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> index 22fc8483256f..f1cb96c08212 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> @@ -20,9 +20,10 @@ allOf:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - - apple,t8103-i2c
> - - apple,i2c
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - apple,t8103-i2c
> + - const: apple,i2c
Nit: the enum makes sense once we add t6000-i2c but right now
properties:
compatible:
items:
- const: apple,t8103-i2c
- const: apple,i2c
also works and look a bit less weird.
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>
Sven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-21 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-21 17:15 [PATCH 0/3] Apple Arm patform device tree and bindings fixes Janne Grunau
2021-11-21 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: i2c: apple,i2c: allow multiple compatibles Janne Grunau
2021-11-21 20:22 ` Sven Peter [this message]
2021-11-22 17:59 ` Janne Grunau
2021-11-22 20:48 ` Sven Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2baebbe6-0080-4cff-86de-a00f23aea95e@www.fastmail.com \
--to=sven@svenpeter.dev \
--cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j@jannau.net \
--cc=kettenis@openbsd.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcan@marcan.st \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox