From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB7CC43460 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE626613A0 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244730AbhDGHqC (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 03:46:02 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:51680 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240787AbhDGHqB (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 03:46:01 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1377jaR1054304; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 02:45:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1617781536; bh=xJ+7JHvMKy97Iq5jhZv0GDQP4glZmSZPs3NNd9WqIz4=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ckOZwBH2lAxhmYfiaQMvHZvGCMcCXLo6tVH2Rw46LA510qJ9FYLYcY8sCgk3FE1nx RBRzB3ryvmyrmSBksXNusl5ugom/5swL/M12vVCCphlpXwWs8aQK9QpCJh0pBvMWoi 8eRCoAENZz3zWSenfUeoo81MWgdYHNmcPgzNAyKA= Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (dfle108.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.29]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 1377jas6013696 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 02:45:36 -0500 Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 02:45:36 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 02:45:36 -0500 Received: from [10.250.234.120] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1377jXEN005249; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 02:45:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: omap: Fix rumtime PM imbalance on error To: Tony Lindgren CC: Dinghao Liu , , Aaro Koskinen , , , References: <20210407033030.13419-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> From: Vignesh Raghavendra Message-ID: <30ed0224-fba3-75c6-c4aa-e2d0724c291b@ti.com> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:15:32 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 4/7/21 11:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Vignesh Raghavendra [210407 06:20]: >> Do we need a Fixes: tag to enable stable backports? > > Well pm_runtime_resume_and_get() was introduced quite recently, and > we already handle the error and bail out. And likely after an error > not much works anyways :) So it might be better to add just a stable > tag v5.10 and later as further backports are not likely needed. > Agree this is not a critical patch for backport. But I do know that pm_runtime_resume_and_get() is backported to v5.4 stable kernel at least [1]. So stable tag with v5.4 perhaps would probably help tools looking for patches to backport. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/12/28/588 > Naturally nothing stopping doing separate backports if really needed > though. > > Regards, > > Tony > Regards Vignesh