From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Felipe Balbi" Subject: Re: twl4030 module rewrite Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:38:47 +0300 Message-ID: <31e679430807110338x4c06fa5bx1f8025c91919933b@mail.gmail.com> References: <31e679430807110216n4ee1c42dy4c5d6e49926f90f3@mail.gmail.com> <20080711120107.6a719943@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080711120107.6a719943-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux I2C List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Jean, On 7/11/08, Jean Delvare wrote: > If you want the same driver to handle all 4 addresses, and you want > them to show as a single device, then the usual way to handle this > would be to have a single address declared in i2c_board_info, and have > the driver itself call i2c_new_dummy() 3 times to request the 3 > additional addresses during device probe. Thanks for this pointer. So to clear my mind, in this time I'd have to keep a list of all 4 i2c_client pointers because they'd have different addresses (although it's the same adapter). -- Best Regards, Felipe Balbi felipebalbi-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c