linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] PM: i2c-designware-platdrv: Clean up PM handling in probe
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 22:45:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3491198.ZaBooUSjR1@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFo_E79POLCuV_0Dd3tDL_Ko-WY_oZ4zLyf=y3GLf52ajg@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday, September 25, 2017 9:12:28 PM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 25 September 2017 at 01:17, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > The power management handling in dw_i2c_plat_probe() is somewhat
> > messy and it is rather hard to figure out the code intention for
> > the case when pm_disabled is set.  In that case, the driver doesn't
> > enable runtime PM at all, but in addition to that it calls
> > pm_runtime_forbid() as though it wasn't sure if runtime PM might
> > be enabled for the device later by someone else.
> >
> > Although that concern doesn't seem to be actually valid, the
> > device is clearly still expected to be PM-capable even in the
> > pm_disabled set case, so a better approach would be to enable
> > runtime PM for it unconditionally and then prevent it from
> > being runtime-suspended by using pm_runtime_forbid().
> 
> This is nice cleanup! However I have one suggestion/comment.
> 
> Using pm_runtime_forbid() to prevent the device from being runtime
> suspended may be a bit fragile, as userspace can then still change to
> "allow" it. Wouldn't it be better to bump the runtime PM usage count
> (pm_runtime_get_noresume()) instead?

Right, this is not a PCI driver. :-)

I'll send an update of this patch shortly.

Thanks,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-25 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-03 23:05 [RFT][PATCH 0/2] i2c: designware: Runtime PM aware system sleep handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-03 23:08 ` [RFT][PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Clean up PM handling in dw_i2c_plat_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 14:40   ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-09-05 14:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-03 23:14 ` [RFT][PATCH 2/2] PM / i2c: designware: Clean up system sleep handling without ACPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-04 10:01   ` [RFT][PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 14:45     ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 14:46       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 14:58         ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 14:55           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:02             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:07             ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 15:04               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:24                 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 15:32                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:41                     ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 21:00                       ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-09-05 21:22                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-04 10:07   ` [RFT][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-09-05 23:41 ` [RFT][PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: designware: Runtime PM aware system sleep handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 23:43   ` [RFT][PATCH v3 1/3] i2c: designware: Clean up PM handling in dw_i2c_plat_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 23:46   ` [RFT][PATCH v3 2/3] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Push system sleep callbacks to late/early stages Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 23:48   ` [RFT][PATCH v3 3/3] PM / i2c: designware: Clean up system sleep handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-06  9:16   ` [RFT][PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: designware: Runtime PM aware " Johannes Stezenbach
2017-09-06  9:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-06 19:59       ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-09-06 21:37         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-08  7:34       ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-09-06 11:06   ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-06 11:14     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-06 13:46     ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-09-24 23:13   ` [PATCH v4 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-24 23:17     ` [PATCH v4 1/3] PM: i2c-designware-platdrv: Clean up PM handling in probe Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-25 19:12       ` Ulf Hansson
2017-09-25 20:45         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-09-25 21:10       ` [Update][PATCH v5 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 11:00         ` Wolfram Sang
2017-09-24 23:20     ` [PATCH v4 2/3] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Push system sleep callbacks to late/early stages Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-25  7:28       ` Wolfram Sang
2017-09-25 12:50         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-25 14:24           ` Wolfram Sang
2017-10-02 23:58         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-28 19:19       ` Lee Jones
2017-09-28 20:51         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 11:00       ` Wolfram Sang
2017-09-24 23:30     ` [PATCH v4 3/3] PM: i2c-designware-platdrv: Suspend/resume at the " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 11:00       ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3491198.ZaBooUSjR1@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=js@sig21.net \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rajatja@google.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).