From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] device property: refactor built-in properties support Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:37:45 +0100 Message-ID: <36215503.lOBnWKWWL0@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1448360579-79260-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1448360579-79260-4-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1448360579-79260-4-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jarkko Nikula , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Mika Westerberg , Kevin Fenzi , Arnd Bergmann , Wolfram Sang List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:22:49 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in bytes) of the > value. The sanity check is done in the accessors. > > The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as device tree. Do I understand correctly that this is indended to make the built-in properties follow the DT layout? Thanks, Rafael