From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Push system sleep callbacks to late/early stages Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:50:56 +0200 Message-ID: <3654965.TWMXy0zEsZ@aspire.rjw.lan> References: <3023226.l5IfJK6GIc@aspire.rjw.lan> <4332008.kXBLY0K23i@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170925072847.nl2a6feqzrzdcxwz@ninjato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170925072847.nl2a6feqzrzdcxwz@ninjato> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , Jarkko Nikula , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Jisheng Zhang , John Stultz , Guodong Xu , Sumit Semwal , Haojian Zhuang , Johannes Stezenbach , Ulf Hansson , Rajat Jain List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Monday, September 25, 2017 9:28:47 AM CEST Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:20:35AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Push the system suspend/resume callbacks of intel-lpss to the late > > suspend/early resume stages to allow child device callbacks to be > > pushed to the late/early stages of suspend/resume too, so as to > > make it possible to avoid resuming the children if they are runtime- > > suspended during system suspend going forward. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula > > Tested-by: Mika Westerberg > > Tested-by: Johannes Stezenbach > > Tested-by: Rajat Jain > > If this series shall go in via I2C, I'd need an ack from Lee for this > one. Sure. > Also, I'd assume this should go in for v4.14 already? Well, it may be slightly late for that. Realistically, the earliest -rc it can get into seems to be -rc4 and I'd prefer it to get a bit more exposure before it gets into a release. It's up to you, though. :-) Thanks, Rafael