From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Francis Moreau" Subject: Re: qestion about I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:44:30 +0200 Message-ID: <38b2ab8a0809050544l1914530clec53494e12c77ff5@mail.gmail.com> References: <38b2ab8a0809040043g7f944872l47f84c53bb213829@mail.gmail.com> <38b2ab8a0809040105j7ae3aca8xd334a4d203d9415b@mail.gmail.com> <20080904103707.557ac764@hyperion.delvare> <38b2ab8a0809040149u2bc0342h5c32b87f9277322f@mail.gmail.com> <20080904120855.7e7b9720@hyperion.delvare> <38b2ab8a0809050157yfb21b08v23ae368d3337c1ca@mail.gmail.com> <20080905112056.44b7b910@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080905112056.44b7b910@hyperion.delvare> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , i2c@lm-sensors.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:57:56 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: ags probably are useful, but they're are hard coded in adapters... > > Nothing prevents you from setting the class flags based on > platform-specific information if you have a need for that. > Just to be sure, do you mean by hacking the adapter source code ? > That being said, in cases where you have that level of information > about which devices are present on the I2C bus, Isn't the case for most of all embedded platforms ? > you probably want to > declare the I2C devices at the platform level, and not rely on probing > at all (so .class is 0). do you mean by using I2C_BOARD_INFO ? Thanks -- Francis