Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] dt-bindings: i2c: realtek,rtl9301-i2c: extend for RTL9607C support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 20/03/2026 11:39, Rustam Adilov wrote:
> On 2026-03-20 09:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 10:57:52PM +0500, Rustam Adilov wrote:
>>> Add the "realtek,rtl9607-i2c" compatible for i2c controller on the
>>> RTL9607C SoC series.
>>>
>>> Add a clocks property to the properties since RTL9607C requires it
>>> along with the realtek,scl. And because RTL9607C is the only one that
>>
>> My previous statement:
>>
>> "Other devices do not *have* any clock input?"
>>
>> And second one:
>>
>> "If devices *do not have* clock, you set it as false (see example schema
>> and even line above!). Clue here is what I wrote "devices" and "do not
>> have"."
>>
>> So why are you using completely different wording "require" with
>> completely different implications?
>>
>> I did not leave any room for interpreation in my statement "If devices
>> *do not have* clock, you set it as false".
> 
> I apologize. I was using "require" merely to relate with "required: - property" notation used in bindings.
> 
> Would changing the commit message to something similar in vein to [1] be better?
> 
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20250927101931.71575-9-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com/

It does not cover clocks and it does not answer whether devices have it
or not.

Decide first whether devices have the clock or not. I asked more than
once last time.

Then write commit msg and code matching this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof