From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354EB2F291B for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758284032; cv=none; b=aKvnDTBlxHd9q1+DyAwaNF7CnMruS1CmoGqURiJvAs4rB+x9OblL8FnF8FDvIk6lnxlVnddhDQhXpXAS2t7JkMRFRGUgLgEE7IWl3iJlr0fZ7comJrmQC3zAH+hQpbAGmiecCjWPjuNJyywcCS8F2etR92Z6O8fxOrmwvBlM6dE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758284032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mPX3rPgCLD2pJ6A7IQXFd6cL6iENN0F0p3N55YZij9c=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cL/OjqKkf6HOAheUhgJO7sXJcMEFxC1kvbKoD903tKxl2TcFxf04rZzK+yG0tqSWuUA2YpKeH52+xBITeVX111AiIiA6wMWadih7VG9wDJ8kkEWWssE2sQdWOaceT143gX/yOq9+bNg/XPaUp2LW9tBarGJ9d0xGKmG6ilmH4k8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=lrMH9cIM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="lrMH9cIM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1758284030; x=1789820030; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mPX3rPgCLD2pJ6A7IQXFd6cL6iENN0F0p3N55YZij9c=; b=lrMH9cIMrS+tTCpB/+GkArE5oqI5wNoqHdADp+vF/Tt7BLVkeaw8uBqT s4Wcb+2w8yx1AB9e93Q64a7DxJEiH1+Bl9brtQY3Mf3azZ76gI6ESixPk 47gJP81evd/QYsKWSAd5eBst6btIpxWJrOI2HsU37qqYFRlFJxiq36017 GgtHAV6k+JKHI3qEb9QeCKiAUoChtXnvF9Sj29tg+RPhTlEO6IirH2gX6 xnjP82Z6xDztyd8/xoyuOYZ6OAi9Rk6klmTiCnSJehveQINBKQn+YnOwb V9EqS4wloeIG1uYWzEGu/Gk2+l9+ZabXPM0aEIa4ICi9SZf6Z9+wL1mv3 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QDuzvFaZTLySglKNTJGGMw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /f+DwpSeTM+hX2Btu9Z1Zw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11557"; a="64268922" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,277,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="64268922" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Sep 2025 05:13:50 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UC0k6ujlTyadJGaE57FGsQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: LrrjO4fPRqOeFHHOY9+I2g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,277,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="180932753" Received: from mylly.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.52]) ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2025 05:13:47 -0700 Message-ID: <45203c37-3be3-4e5f-b191-30c109899355@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:13:46 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] i2c: designware: Misc small fixes To: Jean Delvare , Linux I2C Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Andi Shyti References: <20250918160341.39b66013@endymion> Content-Language: en-US From: Jarkko Nikula In-Reply-To: <20250918160341.39b66013@endymion> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi On 9/18/25 5:03 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi all, > > While working on CVE-2025-38380, I noticed a few issues in the > i2c-designware driver, which I think are worth fixing now to make > future driver development safer and easier. > > [PATCH 1/3] i2c: designware: Use msgs[0] to validate the slave address > [PATCH 2/3] i2c: designware: Extend check for mixed slave addresses > [PATCH 3/3] i2c: designware: Turn models back to enumerated values > > Note that I do not own any supported device so I can't test these > changes. Even though the fixes are rather straightforward, I would > appreciate if someone can test them on actual hardware, to be on the > safe side. > I'm fine with the whole set. Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula