Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c-ibm_iic driver

[Sean MacLennan <smaclennan-Qtffpm9i2AVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Stefan Roese wrote:
>   
>> On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>     
>>> With this Kconfig change, "make menuconfig" lets me select the
>>> i2c-ibm_iic driver on x86_64, but it fails to build horribly. I think
>>> that you want to restrict the build to PPC machines somehow, or at
>>> least make sure that either IBM_OCP or OF support is present.
>>>       
>> How about this:
>>
>> -       depends on IBM_OCP
>> +       depends on 4xx
>>     
>
> I think we should allow it to be built on other platforms as well,
> as long as they have of_platform_device support.
>
> The Axon south bridge used on IBMs QS21 blade probably has an ibm_iic,
> even though it's managed by the firmware and we probably don't want
> to use it at this time, someone could use the same chip in a new
> design and actually do that.
>
> In general, I also like to make it possible to enable drivers just
> for the benefit of compile testing, even for stuff that you can't
> find in any existing HW configuration, so as long as it builds on
> a platform, I think we shouldn't forbid it:
>
> -       depends on IBM_OCP
> +       depends on IBM_OCP || PPC_MERGE
>
>   
I have no problem with this change. If everybody agrees, I can respin 
the patch.

Cheers,
   Sean

_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c