From: Rod Whitby <rod-wR+KslBqWDsXC2x5gXVKYQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org,
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org,
rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: PCF8563 doesn't pass validation check
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:51:55 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <486B64D3.3080600@whitby.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080702131020.28e1979a-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
Jean Delvare wrote:
> I think you should convert rtc-pcf8563 to a new-style i2c driver. Then
> the whole validation function becomes pointless and you can delete it.
> I guess that the PCF8563 chip is used in embedded designs with platform
> code to instantiate the I2C devices as needed, so it should work fine.
> Apparently some IXP4xx platforms already expect rtc-pcf8563 to be a
> new-style i2c driver... I'm curious if some ARM people have already
> converted the driver. Rod?
I believe this patch:
<http://svn.nslu2-linux.org/svnroot/kernel/trunk/patches/2.6.25/rtc-pcf8563-new-style.patch>
was merged as:
<http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e5fc9cc0266e5babcf84c81908ec8843b7e3349f>
-- Rod
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-02 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-02 9:34 PCF8563 doesn't pass validation check Laurent Pinchart
[not found] ` <200807021134.59668.laurentp-BSmb2szPELAwsLKNixborgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-02 11:10 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20080702131020.28e1979a-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-02 11:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
[not found] ` <200807021317.50944.laurentp-BSmb2szPELAwsLKNixborgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-02 11:25 ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-02 11:21 ` Rod Whitby [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=486B64D3.3080600@whitby.id.au \
--to=rod-wr+kslbqwdsxc2x5gxvkyq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox