From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rod Whitby Subject: Re: PCF8563 doesn't pass validation check Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:51:55 +0930 Message-ID: <486B64D3.3080600@whitby.id.au> References: <200807021134.59668.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20080702131020.28e1979a@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080702131020.28e1979a-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org, i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org, rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Jean Delvare wrote: > I think you should convert rtc-pcf8563 to a new-style i2c driver. Then > the whole validation function becomes pointless and you can delete it. > I guess that the PCF8563 chip is used in embedded designs with platform > code to instantiate the I2C devices as needed, so it should work fine. > Apparently some IXP4xx platforms already expect rtc-pcf8563 to be a > new-style i2c driver... I'm curious if some ARM people have already > converted the driver. Rod? I believe this patch: was merged as: -- Rod _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c