From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Aurelio da Costa Subject: Re: pca9665 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:09:53 -0300 Message-ID: <48D39691.1070905@gamic.com> References: <48D12295.8080008@gamic.com> <20080919100819.GC4307@pengutronix.de> <48D38EF5.60303@gamic.com> <20080919115605.GE4307@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080919115605.GE4307-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: i2c-bounces-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org To: i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Sounds like the right way to do it. I just wonder if we simply can > enforce this change of platform_data or if we should provide some > transition feature. Jean, Ben, others, what are your experiences? > > The way it does today is to pass an index for the frequency. I can make the change so that it uses the 9564 by default, and if the frequency is set from 0 - 7 (not possible for a real frequency), I will use it as an index. We may put a warning that this usage is deprecated. Is this acceptable? Marco _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c