From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Jackson Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH v2] Add support for Dallas DS28CM00 Unique ID chip Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:40:07 +0100 Message-ID: <48FE3017.4080009@mimc.co.uk> References: <48FDED5E.5080605@mimc.co.uk> <20081021173505.2f7673e2@hyperion.delvare> <48FE22A2.7030604@mimc.co.uk> <20081021211219.18fb7d84@hyperion.delvare> <48FE2ADC.8020203@mimc.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <48FE2ADC.8020203@mimc.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: i2c@lm-sensors.org, lkml List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Mark Jackson wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:42:42 +0100, Mark Jackson wrote: >>> Jean Delvare wrote: >>>> Nack. No new drivers under drivers/i2c/chips please, it's going away >>>> soon. >>> Okay ... where should any new drivers be located ? >> >> Depends of what the device does. >> * Hardware monitoring chip drivers go to drivers/hwmon >> * RTC chip drivers go to drivers/rtc >> * I/O expander drivers go to drivers/gpio >> If you can't find a suitable directory under drivers, either create a >> new one if that makes sense, or put your driver under drivers/misc. > > Ah, now I understand !! I think drivers/misc is probably a good a place > as any, In fact, I now realise that the device is *really* just a read-only eeprom. So I'm guessing I don't need a custom driver, I can just use the existing "at24" driver. Ho hum ...