From: Timur Tabi <timur-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
To: linuxppc-dev
<linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Mark Brown
<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Calling wait_event_interruptible_timeout() in I2C wait functions
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:37:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49889CFA.7070308@freescale.com> (raw)
In i2c-mpc.c, the i2c_wait() function has this:
} else {
/* Interrupt mode */
result = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(i2c->queue,
(i2c->interrupt & CSR_MIF), timeout * HZ);
if (unlikely(result < 0)) {
pr_debug("I2C: wait interrupted\n");
writeccr(i2c, 0);
} else if (unlikely(!(i2c->interrupt & CSR_MIF))) {
That is, the driver calls wait_event_interruptible_timeout() to wait for
a response from the I2C controller after a read or write operation.
However, it appears that this is not common behavior for I2C driver. In
fact, only these six drivers ever call wait_event_interruptible_timeout():
i2c-cpm.c
i2c-ibm_iic.c
i2c-mpc.c
i2c-taos-evm.c
i2c-iop3xx.c
i2c-mv64xxx.c
Although one would think that calling wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
is a good idea, it fails in one situation: when the abrupt termination
of a process causes an I2C operation to occur. That is, you press ^C in
your application, and the driver issues a final I2C operation to shut
down the device. In this situation, wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
returns -ERESTARTSYS, which is then passed up through
i2c_smbus_write_byte_data().
So my question is, is i2c-mpc.c wrong in using
wait_event_interruptible_timeout()?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-03 19:37 Timur Tabi [this message]
[not found] ` <49889CFA.7070308-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-04 20:00 ` Calling wait_event_interruptible_timeout() in I2C wait functions Mike Ditto
2009-02-04 20:00 ` Mike Ditto
[not found] ` <4989F3F4.7070207@consentry.com>
[not found] ` <4989F3F4.7070207-Vjf7OWgA3BLqlBn2x/YWAg@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05 11:51 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20090205115100.GD422-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2009-02-05 15:18 ` Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49889CFA.7070308@freescale.com \
--to=timur-kzfg59tc24xl57midrcfdg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox