From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darius Augulis Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] I2C driver for MXC Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:03:41 +0200 Message-ID: <49CA017D.20005@gmail.com> References: <49C89E13.7040801@gmail.com> <20090324094215.GA3471@pengutronix.de> <49C8ABE5.40408@gmail.com> <20090325092625.GA3029@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1257; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090325092625.GA3029-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-arm-kernel-xIg/pKzrS19vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Darius wrote: > > >>> Is this the latest version? There was one where you already received >>> additional reviewed and tested tags, so I am confused... >>> >> yes, it is the same V5 version posted on I2C list. >> > > So, is there a reason why you dropped these tags? > > Because I hurry to submit this, because merge window is open. I sent all new MXC patches to Sascha and ML in one serie, to be easy read and merge them. However, this I2C patch has very long story and lot of version numbers. Maintainer should probably take care to merge it now, because I don't have time for this furthermore.