From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryan Mallon Subject: Re: Controlling Driver Load Order Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:54:16 +1200 Message-ID: <4BFEEA08.70401@bluewatersys.com> References: <20100526235246.GA31068@pengutronix.de> <20100527041358.GA14070@pengutronix.de> <4BFEDF6D.3090100@bluewatersys.com> <20100527214209.GC5636@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100527214209.GC5636-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Robert Emanuele , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Looks like this has already been done: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org/msg03056.html > > Always ask which kernel is used, sigh... Sorry? I didn't see a kernel version mentioned. I went looking because I had though that i2c-gpio was already subsys_initcall. >> There was a discussion a while back to make all of the embedded i2c >> busses be subsys_initcall since i2c is often a system bus on embedded > > Oh, where was that? Can't recall (but couldn't recall that I acked the i2c-gpio > patch above as well ;)) > Moving the embedded i2c busses to subsys_initcall was discussed here: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-June/004142.html. The i2c_gpio bus got mentioned, which is why I thought it had already been changed. ~Ryan -- Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St ryan-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013 http://www.bluewatersys.com New Zealand Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751 Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934