From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shinya Kuribayashi Subject: Re: [CORRECTED] I2C driver supporting Moorestown and Medfield platform Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:58:01 +0900 Message-ID: <4C609609.6070307@renesas.com> References: <20100803143431.23655.31975.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <4C5F97AC.1020509@renesas.com> <20100809120743.05e22ef4@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100809120743.05e22ef4-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alan Cox Cc: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 8/9/2010 8:07 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > There are various little differences along with the PCI, power > management, timing and configuration side. I've also looked at the two I'm interested in those little diffs. > side by side and agreed with the original Intel authors that it seemed > best to keep it as two drivers. Otherwise you drag a lot of PCI and PCI > pm logic into a simpler driver that is used on non PCI platforms. Got it, thanks. I'll have a look at the differences, first. -- Shinya Kuribayashi Renesas Electronics