From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-i801: Don't probe for slaves on IDF channels Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:41:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4DC94EB2.6020007@redhat.com> References: <20110510160835.37bea352@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110510160835.37bea352-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux I2C , David Woodhouse List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 05/10/2011 04:08 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > I don't know if Fujitsu is ever going to produce Patsburg-based > machines, but if they do, I'd rather not probe the secondary (IDF) > SMBus channels. At least not until we have a good reason for doing so. > > On a side note, I'm not even sure if it is right to enable detection > of HWMON and DDC devices on the IDF channels. Time will tell... > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > Cc: Hans de Goede > CC: David Woodhouse > --- > Hans, David, what do you think? Not probing for the FSC devices on the idf channel sounds reasonable to me. Note that Fujitsu has moved to using super io chips for hwmon now instead of their own i2c solutions, so for newer motherboards there aren't any of these i2c chips present at all. Regards, Hans