From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomoya MORINAGA Subject: Re: Problems with i2c_eg20t Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:34:46 +0900 Message-ID: <4EA0BE26.4070609@dsn.lapis-semi.com> References: <4E9D6F9A.2060406@dsn.lapis-semi.com> <20111020232701.GK19115@trinity.fluff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111020232701.GK19115-SMNkleLxa3Z6Wcw2j4pizdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Dooks Cc: Christian Gmeiner , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, (2011/10/21 8:27), Ben Dooks wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:22:50PM +0900, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: >> (2011/10/18 20:16), Christian Gmeiner wrote: >> >> Hi, Christian >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> I am using a 3.0.7 linux kernel with "[PATCH x/7 v4] i2c-eg20t: ..." >>> from 12. October on top of >>> it. > > Shall I leave v4 on the list of things to submit? The latest i2c-eg20t.c with v4 patch series works fine both our side and customer side. So, I want you to merge v4 series to linux upstream tree. As to Christian's issue, we will analyze it. (Unfortunately, we have just involved another task. So, we can't start soon) Thanks, -- tomoya ROHM Co., Ltd.