From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c/designware: dw_i2c_init_driver as subsys initcall Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:32:08 +0530 Message-ID: <4F476E30.60807@st.com> References: <1321419487-2353-1-git-send-email-pratyush.anand@st.com> <20111116051440.GA3142@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <20111116052718.GE2286@DLH10011> <20111116082233.GB10335@sapphire.tkos.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111116082233.GB10335-MwjkAAnuF3khR1HGirfZ1z4kX+cae0hd@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Baruch Siach Cc: Shiraz HASHIM , Pratyush ANAND , "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Armando VISCONTI , Vipin KUMAR , Rajeev KUMAR , Deepak SIKRI , Vipul Kumar SAMAR , Amit VIRDI , Bhupesh SHARMA , Bhavna YADAV , Vincenzo FRASCINO , Mirko GARDI List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 11/16/2011 1:52 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: > Dependencies should be stated explicitly. Since this subsys_initcall thing is > quite common among the i2c masters I'm willing to ack this one for now. But > the real solution is to make the dependencies between devices clear and > explicit. Baruch, Did you apply this patch? -- viresh