From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: mux: add device tree support
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:11:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F958D45.1080800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F957F9F.7000309-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
On 04/23/2012 09:13 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 05:15 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:49:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Warren<swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>> * Define core portions of the DT binding for I2C bus muxes.
>>> * Enhance i2c_add_mux_adapter():
>>> ** Add parameters required for DT support. Update all callers.
>>> ** Set the appropriate adap->dev.of_node for the child bus.
>>> ** Call of_i2c_register_devices() for the child bus.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren<swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> David Daney (CCed) posted another variant [1]. Just looking at the
>> patches (and not really using them), I tend to like the approach using
>> <reg> better. But I am open for discussion, so I'd appreciate your
>> feedback.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Wolfram
>>
>> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/12/423
>
> Ah, that does look like a reasonable binding.
>
It was arrived at by iterating through several versions with Grant and Rob.
You make at least the third person (after me and Lars-Peter Clausen)
wanting to use the device tree to configure the I2C muxes. So at a
minimum, it shows a need for this.
David Daney.
> I had meant to call out to reviewers the potentially unusual use of
> explicitly named sub-nodes, rather than using the usual reg-based matching.
>
> The main reason I chose named sub-nodes for the busses was so the
> sub-nodes would match the pinctrl named states. However, I think we can
> make the pinctrl numbering match rather than the pinctrl naming instead.
> The only issue is the "idle" state; if we allow it to exist anywhere in
> the pinctrl-names list, it'll make the pinctrl numbering mismatch the
> sub-node numbering. I think we can solve this by forcing the idle state
> to be listed last in pinctrl-names (if it's listed at all). I'll update
> my patches based on that David's patch.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 18:49 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: mux: add device tree support Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <1334688545-8465-1-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-17 18:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Add generic I2C multiplexer using pinctrl API Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <1334688545-8465-2-git-send-email-swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-17 19:50 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-23 11:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: mux: add device tree support Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120423111507.GF19192-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-23 16:13 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <4F957F9F.7000309-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-23 17:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-23 17:11 ` David Daney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F958D45.1080800@gmail.com \
--to=ddaney.cavm-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).