From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Yanes Subject: Re: AW: [PATCH v10 3/4] drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c: add new driver Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 22:07:51 +0300 Message-ID: <4FAAC087.7030304@ayanes.com> References: Reply-To: devel@ayanes.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org >> Yes, our ECO920 uses the RM9200, but we support it with an very old kernel >> (2.6.21). I remember there were many problems with I2C. I really doubt this, as I indicated in a previous email[1], the RM9200 has a hardware "bug". So either you performed the testing with less than 2 bytes of data and in a really low frequency (<50kHz) or we are missing something. Can you provide more details about which kind of testing you performed? Thanks 1 - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1287445/match=