From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol mangling Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:54:53 +0530 Message-ID: <4FABA585.7090600@nvidia.com> References: <1335251976-31925-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1335251976-31925-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1335251976-31925-3-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Laxman Dewangan Cc: "w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org" , "ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org" , "swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org" , "olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org" , "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Jean, On Tuesday 24 April 2012 12:49 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Adding support for protocol mangling I2C_M_NOSTART. > When multiple message transfer request made through i2c > and if any message is flagged with I2C_M_NOSTART then > it will not send the start/repeat start/address of that > message i.e. send the data directly. > Now the framework/core changes for making M_NOSTART as a separate flag is already part of your tree. So do I need to re-send the patch for having that change? 1/1 is already part of Wolfram's tree and so not sure that how do I go i.e. from where I take the base i2c-tegra driver. It may create the problem in integration on main if they are not sync. Also I have some couple of changes which will be on top of this. Thanks, Laxman