From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Stigge Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-embedded for 3.5 Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 17:23:16 +0200 Message-ID: <4FC0F564.6040609@antcom.de> References: <20120526140650.GA7133@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120526140650.GA7133-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jean Delvare , Ben Dooks , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 26/05/12 16:06, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Note that you will get a trivial merge-conflict because some > lpc32xx-patches have already come in via arm-soc to reduce dependencies. > I read that you want to see such conflicts so I didn't take any actions. > I'll add Arnd and Roland to CC, because they know best about LPC32xx > changes. There are already some i2c commits in master that came via arm-soc. Expect conflicts with some LPC32xx related commits from i2c-embedded. They are basically the same patches, applied as different commits though, sorry. But should be easy to resolve. Roland