From: Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shubhrajyoti Datta <omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
tony@atomide.com, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv10 00/11] I2C fixes
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:09:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD62D56.2020500@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120611160034.GA3887@pengutronix.de>
On Monday 11 June 2012 09:30 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Agree,
>> > These are only fixes can it be considered for rc3?
> "Baking in linux-next" and "considering rc3" don't match; baking needs
> time, rc3 is soon. I've put the patches now into my -next branch for
> more exposure.
Thanks.
> I am still uncertain if they should be in 3.5 already;
> there seem to be worhty fixes in there, but they do depend on stuff
> which don't really qualify as bugfixes...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-11 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-29 10:56 [PATCHv10 00/11] I2C fixes Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 05/11] I2C: OMAP: Don't check if wait_for_completion_timeout() returns less than zero Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 08/11] I2C: OMAP: prevent the overwrite of the errata flags Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1338288983-15026-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 01/11] I2C: OMAP: make omap_i2c_unidle/idle functions depend on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 02/11] I2C: OMAP: Fix the mismatch of pm_runtime enable and disable Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 03/11] I2C: OMAP: Fix the interrupt clearing in OMAP4 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 04/11] I2C: OMAP: Prevent the register access after pm_runtime_put in probe Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCH 06/11] I2C: OMAP: Fix the crash in i2c remove Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCH 07/11] I2C: OMAP: Handle error check for pm runtime Shubhrajyoti D
2012-06-27 1:43 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <874npxv8aj.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-27 9:01 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 09/11] I2C: OMAP: Do not set the XUDF(Transmit underflow) if the underflow is not reached Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 10/11] I2C: OMAP: Rename the 1p153 to the erratum id i462 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-29 10:56 ` [PATCHv10 11/11] OMAP/I2C - Fix timeout problem during suspend Shubhrajyoti D
2012-05-31 22:59 ` [PATCHv10 00/11] I2C fixes Kevin Hilman
2012-06-10 5:40 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-06-11 16:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-06-11 17:39 ` Shubhrajyoti [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD62D56.2020500@ti.com \
--to=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omaplinuxkernel@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).