From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] i2c: Hookup typec power-negotation to the PMIC and charger Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:54:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4f00b1f8-2574-b924-f1e6-f6e7a2ee66f8@redhat.com> References: <20171011094121.6108-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20171019144251.hmvkaijwbgamaqoo@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60850 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753633AbdJSOyb (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:54:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20171019144251.hmvkaijwbgamaqoo@katana> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Andy Shevchenko , "Krogerus, Heikki" , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Jarkko Nikula , Andy Shevchenko , Platform Driver , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-i2c Hi, On 19-10-17 16:42, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> The first patch, although it is an i2c-core change, is really >> quite simple. I believe anyone can review it. But it does need >> someone other then me to take a proper look (and not just do >> a code only review) because it is a core change. Maybe there >> is another way to solve the problem (persistent / predictable >> device-names for i2c devices instantiated through board-data), >> but I don't think so. > > My plan is to hopefully meet Mark Brown (SPI and regulator maintainer) > at ELCE next week and have a chat with him about this series. If all > goes well, I'll merge it for v4.15. Great, thank you for looking into this. Regards, Hans