linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org"
	<khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	"ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org"
	<ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	"w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org"
	<w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: tegra: dynamically control fast clk
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:15:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <502E914A.1030906@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502E9051.4090507-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>

On Saturday 18 August 2012 12:11 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 01:48 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> Tegra I2C driver enables the fast clock during initialization
>> and does not disable till driver removed.
>> Enable this clock before transfer and disable after transfer done.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> This patch is on top of the clock chnages which is in Tegra sub system and
>> based on
>>   i2c: tegra: I2_M_NOSTART functionality not supported in Tegra20
>> So recommend to go on tegra sub-system.
> What exactly is this patch based on? I checked out Tegra's
> for-3.7/drivers-i2c, cherry-picked the M_NOSTART patch you mentioned,
> and attempted to apply this patch. It doesn't apply. Same if I don't
> cherry-pick the M_NOSTART patch, and same for next-20120816 with/without
> the M_NOSTART patch.

Then It seems I need to create the patch again and send it.  The 
M_NOSTART patch was on tot before clock related change and that is the 
reason it is not applying.
Should I re-send these two patches together as 1/2 and 2/2 to maintain 
sequence?
I can create based on your clock tree.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-17 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-17  7:48 [PATCH] i2c: tegra: dynamically control fast clk Laxman Dewangan
     [not found] ` <1345189711-24104-1-git-send-email-ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-17 18:41   ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]     ` <502E9051.4090507-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-17 18:45       ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
     [not found]         ` <502E914A.1030906-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-17 19:07           ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=502E914A.1030906@nvidia.com \
    --to=ldewangan-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).