From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludovic.desroches Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c: add new driver Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:10:00 +0200 Message-ID: <503CDF48.5080201@atmel.com> References: <4f3dcfbf1e8eab3e251ab3558e9e1e9123643928.1345618760.git.n.voss@weinmann.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4f3dcfbf1e8eab3e251ab3558e9e1e9123643928.1345618760.git.n.voss@weinmann.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Nikolaus Voss Cc: rmallon@gmail.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com, h.feurstein@gmail.com, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, adrian.yanes@aalto.fi, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, carsten.behling@garz-fricke.com List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi Nikolaus, I forgot one correction I did in your patch: Le 11/08/2011 11:49 AM, Nikolaus Voss a =E9crit : [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at9= 1/at91sam9261_devices.c > index 9295e90..27fddc1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c > @@ -283,9 +283,18 @@ static struct i2c_gpio_platform_data pdata =3D { > .udelay =3D 2, /* ~100 kHz */ > }; > > +static const struct platform_device_id twi_ip_type =3D { > + /* > + * driver_data is 2 for SAM9261 compatible ip, see enum twi_ip_id in > + * drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c > + */ > + .driver_data =3D 2, > +}; > + > static struct platform_device at91sam9261_twi_device =3D { > .name =3D "i2c-gpio", > .id =3D -1, > + .id_entry =3D &twi_ip_type, > .dev.platform_data =3D &pdata, > }; > [...] You add the id_entry to the i2c-gpio device instead of at91_i2c device. Regards Ludovic