From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shubhrajyoti Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 20/23] i2c: omap: switch to threaded IRQ support Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:55:39 +0530 Message-ID: <50502AE3.7040300@ti.com> References: <1347356538-23835-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <1347356538-23835-21-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <20120911215112.GA27031@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120911215112.GA27031-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, Felipe Balbi List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 12 September 2012 03:21 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> -omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id) >> > +omap_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) >> > { >> > struct omap_i2c_dev *dev = dev_id; >> > + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > Shouldn't that be IRQ_NONE? Actually we are processing it so I thought it to be ok. Also a similar discussion. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-June/104422.html